[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5717EF59.1030709@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:06:33 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
On 04/20/2016 01:45 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:04:05AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> The reason it breaks is because the same register can't be an
>> input-output register and a separate input. However, the input side of
>> the input-output is probably undefined, and so gcc may not notice.
>
> So Michal and I talked about this a while ago. Why do we need the '"a"
> (sem)' input dependency if '"+a" (ret)' already supplies the same thing?
>
Setting ret to sem doesn't make any sense. Just use "=a" and "a".
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists