linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160421191850.65a07e86@bahia.huguette.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:18:50 +0200
From:	Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@...gnu.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:

> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz:
> > So we're good ?  
> 
> I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2.
> 

As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if
that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you
can give an Acked-by ?

> >                 Whose tree can carry these patches ?  
> 
> (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.)
> 
> What do you think is best?  My experience in this regard is pretty low.
> 

Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and
PowerPC :) KVM maintainers...

Thanks anyway for your valuable help !

Cheers.

--
Greg