linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160421173931.GB31953@potion>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:39:31 +0200
From:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:	Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@...gnu.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation

2016-04-21 19:18+0200, Greg Kurz:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200
> Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:
>> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz:
>> > So we're good ?  
>> 
>> I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2.
>> 
> 
> As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if
> that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you
> can give an Acked-by ?

I'm evil when it comes to APIs, so bear it a bit longer. :)

>> >                 Whose tree can carry these patches ?  
>> 
>> (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.)
>> 
>> What do you think is best?  My experience in this regard is pretty low.
>> 
> 
> Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and
> PowerPC :) KVM maintainers...

Ok.