[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160421200857.53845535@bahia.huguette.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:08:57 +0200
From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@...gnu.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:39:31 +0200
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:
> 2016-04-21 19:18+0200, Greg Kurz:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200
> > Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz:
> >> > So we're good ?
> >>
> >> I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2.
> >>
> >
> > As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if
> > that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you
> > can give an Acked-by ?
>
> I'm evil when it comes to APIs, so bear it a bit longer. :)
>
Fair enough :)
> >> > Whose tree can carry these patches ?
> >>
> >> (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.)
> >>
> >> What do you think is best? My experience in this regard is pretty low.
> >>
> >
> > Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and
> > PowerPC :) KVM maintainers...
>
> Ok.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists