[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571876AB.2060106@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:43:55 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: lwn@....net
Subject: Re: stable-security kernel updates
On 04/20/2016, 09:50 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Updates for stable-security kernels have been released:
>
> - v3.12.58-security
I suggest nobody uses that kernel.
That tree does not make much sense to me. For example, what's the
purpose of "kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE" (commit
230fa253df6352af12ad0a16128760b5cb3f92df upstream) without actually
using the added macros (this commit was only a prerequisite)?
Ok, not that bad, it is only unused code, but why are *not* these in the
security tree?
ipr: Fix out-of-bounds null overwrite
Input: powermate - fix oops with malicious USB descriptors
rapidio/rionet: fix deadlock on SMP
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists