lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422135014.GM2998@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:50:15 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
	marc.zyngier@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Vadim.Lomovtsev@...iumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=N

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:25:35PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> maxcpu=n sets the number of CPUs activated at boot time to a max of n,
> but allowing the remaining CPUs to be brought up later if the user
> decides to do so. However, on arm64 due to various reasons, we disallowed
> hotplugging CPUs beyond n, by marking them not present. Now that
> we have checks in place to make sure the hotplugged CPUs have compatible
> features with system and requires no new errata, relax the restriction.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ