[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422134929.GG29406@pali>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:49:29 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machel <pavel@....cz>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Timo Kokkonen <timo.t.kokkonen@....fi>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Nokia N900: Broken lirc ir-rx51 driver
On Tuesday 05 January 2016 17:12:50 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> [160105 02:19]:
> > On Saturday 02 January 2016 09:06:57 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > Yup please take a look at thread "[PATCH 0/3] pwm: omap: Add PWM support
> > > using dual-mode timers". Chances are we still need to set up the dmtimer
> > > code to provide also irqchip functions. That way ir-rx51.c can just do
> > > request_irq on the selected dmtimer for interrupts.
> >
> > No I see that patch from that thread uses dmtimer.h from plat-omap. So
> > it is really OK?
>
> It's using the header to populate the platform data in mach-omap2 so
> that's fine. But we do not want to directly expose the dmtimer functions
> to device drivers as they are not Linux generic at this point.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
Hi Tony! Is there any progress for ir-rx51 driver? Months ago we were
waiting for some omap pwm patches... What is current state?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists