[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422181643.GF15090@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:16:43 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
toshi.kani@...com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
luto@...capital.net, mcgrof@...e.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jbeulich@...e.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
brgerst@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, JGross@...e.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/mm/xen: Suppress hugetlbfs in PV guests
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:03:53AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Please don't use the cpu_has_* macros anymore, they are going away soon.
>
> In this case it should be static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE).
Ingo fixed this up while merging:
b2eafe890d4a ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86/asm, to fix semantic conflict")
The cpu_has_* things are gone now in tip! \o/
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists