[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160425073940.GD1541@katana>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:39:41 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@...-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add generic support passing secondary devices
addresses
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:14:37PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > The above should work with both DT and ACPI so I'm OK with the current
> > > patch. We can add ACPI parts later when needed.
> >
> > Just to make sure, I read this as an ack for the original patch?
>
> Yes :)
Thanks! Could you use the formal tag for that in the future please?
Patchwork automatically collects them and that saves me some work. (I
even have a keyboard macro for that and use it a lot)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists