[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160425074126.GL1725@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:41:26 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@...-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add generic support passing secondary devices
addresses
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:14:37PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > > > The above should work with both DT and ACPI so I'm OK with the current
> > > > patch. We can add ACPI parts later when needed.
> > >
> > > Just to make sure, I read this as an ack for the original patch?
> >
> > Yes :)
>
> Thanks! Could you use the formal tag for that in the future please?
> Patchwork automatically collects them and that saves me some work. (I
> even have a keyboard macro for that and use it a lot)
Sure, sorry about that.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists