linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add generic support passing secondary devices addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57513ED8.6000703@metafoo.de>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:24:56 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
	pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
	Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@...-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add generic support passing secondary devices
 addresses

On 04/25/2016 09:41 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:14:37PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The above should work with both DT and ACPI so I'm OK with the current
>>>>> patch. We can add ACPI parts later when needed.
>>>>
>>>> Just to make sure, I read this as an ack for the original patch?
>>>
>>> Yes :)
>>
>> Thanks! Could you use the formal tag for that in the future please?
>> Patchwork automatically collects them and that saves me some work. (I
>> even have a keyboard macro for that and use it a lot)
> 
> Sure, sorry about that.
> 
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>

Hi Wolfram,

It looks like everybody was OK now with this patch, but it got lost somehow.
Should it be resent, or can you still pick it up from patchwork?

Thanks,
- Lars