[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1604250950380.3941@nanos>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:52:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...capital.net, david.vrabel@...rix.com, brgerst@...il.com,
toshi.kani@...com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
dvlasenk@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
Juergen Gross <JGross@...e.com>,
Luis Rodriguez <Mcgrof@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/mm/xen: Suppress hugetlbfs in PV guests
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.04.16 at 20:03, <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> >> +#define hugepages_supported() cpu_has_pse
> >>
> >
> > Please don't use the cpu_has_* macros anymore, they are going away soon.
> >
> > In this case it should be static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE).
>
> I can certainly do that, but this
> - will (mildly) harm backportability
> - imo should have been requested much earlier (when the patch was
> still under discussion)
It's requested now as cpu_has_* is going away. So instead of making silly
arguments you should have sent a delta patch fixing this.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists