[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160426083014.GA29628@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:30:14 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.
Have you verified that this compiles against my tree?
/Jarkko
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 5bc530c..aca4505 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -212,11 +212,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
> if (IS_ERR(chip))
> return chip;
>
> - rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
> - if (rc) {
> - put_device(&chip->dev);
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
> + &chip->dev);
> + if (rc)
> return ERR_PTR(rc);
> - }
>
> dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists