linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160430170025.GB25043@sudip-laptop>
Date:	Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:00:25 +0100
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:30:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> > in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> > and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.
> 
> Have you verified that this compiles against my tree?

This was done against linux-next. But now I have just rebased against
the charmisc tree and sent v2. Also added the Reviewed-by tag to it.
(hope thats ok)

regards
sudip