linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: sti: Update example to include assigned-clocks and mclk-fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:23:57 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
	patrice.chotard@...com, vinod.koul@...el.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, ludovic.barre@...com, arnaud.pouliquen@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: sti: Update example to include
 assigned-clocks and mclk-fs

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This one is more relevant though I'm still a bit concerned that there's
> > an expectation that the examples can just be pasted in...

> So although I would only consider copying an example as the starting
> point for getting something working (and indeed it was the case here). On STi
> arch there *should* be a very high probability that copying the exanple 
> is all that will be required.

If there are never going to be any new users why bother at all, why
would anyone paste it in when all the SoCs that ever use this are
already upstream?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)