linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: sti: Update example to include assigned-clocks and mclk-fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:51:29 +0100
From:	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
	patrice.chotard@...com, vinod.koul@...el.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, ludovic.barre@...com, arnaud.pouliquen@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: sti: Update example to include
 assigned-clocks and mclk-fs

Hi Mark,

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This one is more relevant though I'm still a bit concerned that there's
> > > an expectation that the examples can just be pasted in...
> 
> > So although I would only consider copying an example as the starting
> > point for getting something working (and indeed it was the case here). On STi
> > arch there *should* be a very high probability that copying the exanple 
> > is all that will be required.
> 
> If there are never going to be any new users why bother at all, why
> would anyone paste it in when all the SoCs that ever use this are
> already upstream?

Generally if I come across documentation which is incorrect, I like to fix it.

Currently the DT ASoC documentation doesn't match the driver and the example
doesn't work, which is not ideal. I could well be the last person who needs
to read it & use the example, but deliberately leaving it with mistakes in
seemed like a bad idea.

Peter.