[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160426145129.GA11946@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:51:29 +0100
From:	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
	patrice.chotard@...com, vinod.koul@...el.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, ludovic.barre@...com, arnaud.pouliquen@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: sti: Update example to include
 assigned-clocks and mclk-fs
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This one is more relevant though I'm still a bit concerned that there's
> > > an expectation that the examples can just be pasted in...
> 
> > So although I would only consider copying an example as the starting
> > point for getting something working (and indeed it was the case here). On STi
> > arch there *should* be a very high probability that copying the exanple 
> > is all that will be required.
> 
> If there are never going to be any new users why bother at all, why
> would anyone paste it in when all the SoCs that ever use this are
> already upstream?
Generally if I come across documentation which is incorrect, I like to fix it.
Currently the DT ASoC documentation doesn't match the driver and the example
doesn't work, which is not ideal. I could well be the last person who needs
to read it & use the example, but deliberately leaving it with mistakes in
seemed like a bad idea.
Peter. 
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
