linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix module probe issue if no dwarf support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:44:46 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
	mhiramat@...nel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
	srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix module probe issue if no dwarf
 support

Em Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:42:46PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 26 April 2016 08:04 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:55:40PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> >>Perf is not able to register probe in kernel module when dwarf supprt
> >>is not there(and so it goes for symtab). Perf passes full path of
> >>module where only module name is required which is causing the problem.
> >>This patch fixes this issue.
> >Is this v3? What has changed from v2?
> >
> >- Arnaldo
> 
> Yes Arnaldo. But I changed it from [RFC] to [PATCH], so didn't include
> version. Here is [RFC v2] link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/26/114
> 
> Changes w.r.t. [RFC v2]:
>   - Swapped patch in series and move definition of find_module_name in other
> patch.

Ok, hadn't noticed the change from RFC to PATCH, and Masami just acked
it, applying.

- Arnaldo