lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160426172629.GA42777@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:26:32 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LBR callchains from tracepoints

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:38:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:24:31PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:03:58PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > I now need to continue investigation why this doesn't seem to work from
> > > tracepoints...
> > 
> > Bummer, the changeset (at the end of this message) hasn't any
> > explanation, is this really impossible? I.e. LBR callstacks from
> > tracepoints? Even if we set perf_event_attr.exclude_callchain_kernel?
> 
> Could maybe be done, but its tricky to implement as the LBR is managed
> by the hardware PMU and tracepoints are a software PMU, so we need to
> then somehow frob with cross-pmu resources, in a very arch specific way.
> And programmability of the hardware PMU will then depend on events
> outside of it.

btw we're thinking to add support for lbr to bpf, so that from the program
we can get accurate and fast stacks. That's especially important for user
space stacks. No clear idea how to do it yet, but it would be really useful.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ