[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160426172710.GI5995@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:27:11 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc: BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, ldewangan@...dia.com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marek@...delico.com,
kernel@...a-handheld.com, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: omap5: describe control for ckobuffer
Tero,
* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [160418 11:23]:
> OMAP5 has a register to control if the ckobuffer is enabled
> and defines the polarity. ckobuffer is required to drive a twl6040
> with the system clock. Hence, add the pinctrl,single to the
> OMAP5 SoC description so that omap5-board-common can
> set up the ckobuffer as required.
Is this really a mux or should it be a mux clock?
Regards,
Tony
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
> index 120b6b8..1d9050f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
> @@ -277,6 +277,16 @@
> pinctrl-single,register-width = <16>;
> pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x7fff>;
> };
> +
> + omap5_control_ckobuffer: pinmux@...4 {
> + compatible = "ti,omap5-padconf",
> + "pinctrl-single";
> + reg = <0xcdb4 4>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>;
> + pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0xf0000000>;
> + };
> };
>
> ocmcram: ocmcram@...00000 {
> --
> 2.7.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists