[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160427003746.GC4782@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:37:46 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [-mmots 2016-04-25] hugetlb: error: ‘cpu_has_pse’ undeclared
On (04/26/16 15:00), Andrew Morton wrote:
> > v4.6-rc5-mmots-2016-04-25-17-33
> >
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:418:0,
> > from fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:28:
> > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: In function 'init_hugetlbfs_fs':
> > ./arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:7:31: error: 'cpu_has_pse' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > #define hugepages_supported() cpu_has_pse
> > ^
>
> hm, how did that happen. I had some issues with cpu_has_pse a number
> of days ago but they later went away.
>
> In my current tree I have, in arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:
>
> #define hugepages_supported() boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE)
>
> and that came in from linux-next.patch. I wonder why your tree is
> different.
>
> <looks>
>
> OK, http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/linux-next.patch has no
> changes to arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h at all. Maybe I fat-fingered
> something. Odd.
>
> I have just uploaded a new snapshot - it should be good now. Sorry about
> that.
no worries. thanks!
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists