[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160427080102.GA16991@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:01:02 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [-mmots 2016-04-25] hugetlb: error: ‘cpu_has_pse’ undeclared
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:14:35 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > v4.6-rc5-mmots-2016-04-25-17-33
> >
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:418:0,
> > from fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:28:
> > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: In function 'init_hugetlbfs_fs':
> > ./arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:7:31: error: 'cpu_has_pse' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > #define hugepages_supported() cpu_has_pse
> > ^
>
> hm, how did that happen. I had some issues with cpu_has_pse a number
> of days ago but they later went away.
>
> In my current tree I have, in arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:
>
> #define hugepages_supported() boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE)
>
> and that came in from linux-next.patch. I wonder why your tree is
> different.
>
> <looks>
>
> OK, http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/linux-next.patch has no
> changes to arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h at all. Maybe I fat-fingered
> something. Odd.
So I think the reason is that cpu_has_pse is gone from the x86 devel tree, please
use this instead:
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists