linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: remove NULL return path for vcpu ids >= KVM_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160427144010.GA27247@potion>
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:40:14 +0200
From:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:	Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-ppc@...gnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: remove NULL return path for vcpu ids >=
 KVM_MAX_VCPUS

2016-04-27 05:40-0400, Gerg Kurz:
> Quoting Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> 
>> Commit c896939f7cff ("KVM: use heuristic for fast VCPU lookup by id") added
>> a return path that prevents vcpu ids to exceed KVM_MAX_VCPUS. This is a
>> problem for powerpc where vcpu ids can grow up to 8*KVM_MAX_VCPUS.
>> 
>> This patch simply reverses the logic so that we only try fast path if the
>> vcpu id can be tried as an index in kvm->vcpus[]. The slow path is not
>> affected by the change.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
> 
> Radim,
> 
> I think this sanity check is only needed because kvm_get_vcpu() use the
> id as an index in kvm->vcpus[]. Checking against the new KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID
> would be clearly wrong here.

I agree, checking KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID would be pointless.

> And this patch got two R-b tags already. Do you agree we keep it ?

Yes, thanks.