[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8d4840e84871847ee1bae56a776907d08a9265f7@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 03:28:22 -0700
From: tip-bot for David Howells <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/Documentation: State purpose of
memory-barriers.txt
Commit-ID: 8d4840e84871847ee1bae56a776907d08a9265f7
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8d4840e84871847ee1bae56a776907d08a9265f7
Author: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:22:06 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:57:51 +0200
locking/Documentation: State purpose of memory-barriers.txt
There has been some confusion about the purpose of memory-barriers.txt,
so this commit adds a statement of purpose.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: corbet@....net
Cc: dave@...olabs.net
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@....com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461691328-5429-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index fb2dd35..8b11e54 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -19,6 +19,22 @@ in case of any doubt (and there are many) please ask.
To repeat, this document is not a specification of what Linux expects from
hardware.
+The purpose of this document is twofold:
+
+ (1) to specify the minimum functionality that one can rely on for any
+ particular barrier, and
+
+ (2) to provide a guide as to how to use the barriers that are available.
+
+Note that an architecture can provide more than the minimum requirement
+for any particular barrier, but if the architecure provides less than
+that, that architecture is incorrect.
+
+Note also that it is possible that a barrier may be a no-op for an
+architecture because the way that arch works renders an explicit barrier
+unnecessary in that case.
+
+
========
CONTENTS
========
Powered by blists - more mailing lists