[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160428134551.GA2389@joana>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:45:51 -0300
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] De-stage Sync File Framework
2016-04-27 Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:27:07PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patchset sits on top of Sync ABI Rework v13:
> >
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg105667.html
> >
> > The first eight clean up and prepare sync_file for de-staging. The last four
> > patches do the de-staging, moving files to drivers/dma-buf/ and include/linux/
> > plus adding Documentation.
> >
> > As the de-stage depends upon many changes on the staging tree it would
> > be good to get all the patches merged through the staging tree if Sumit
> > agrees with that.
> >
> > The next step on the Sync de-stage is clean up the remaining bits
> > of the Sync Framework, mainly SW_SYNC, which is only used for testing.
>
> Ok I looked once more at all this stuff, and there's some nitpicks I
> discussed with Gustavo on irc. But really their small, and I think
> perfectly ok to address them once sync_file is destaged. Especially since
> there's a lot more work pending on top of this, so we really want to get
> sync_file.[hc] destaged in 4.7. It'll take us a few iterations and a few
> drivers using this in anger in upstream to perfect the internal interfaces
> anyway, but let's get this started.
>
> Had some real nitpicks on the docs patch, but that can also be merged
> later on imo. Except for that patch, on the series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>
Thanks for the review, I'm sending v2 fixing the nitpicks you pointed
out.
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists