[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda=EtfuQZT6wcrZM4R4FhvM9A9N6sXRrvWV2bYgiDShGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:44:13 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
amelie.delaunay@...com, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, dev@...xeye.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] gpio: stmpe: Add STMPE1600 support
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, <patrice.chotard@...com> wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
>
> The particularities of this variant are:
> - GPIO_XXX_LSB and GPIO_XXX_MSB memory locations are inverted compared
> to other variants.
> - There is no Edge detection, Rising Edge and Falling Edge registers.
> - IRQ flags are cleared when read, no need to write in Status register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists