linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dt_to_config - report kernel config options for a devicetree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:38:35 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:	Gaurav Minocha <gaurav.minocha.os@...il.com>
Cc:	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Alison Chaiken <alison_chaiken@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dt_to_config - report kernel config options
 for a devicetree

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Gaurav Minocha
<gaurav.minocha.os@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
>>>
>>> Determining which kernel config options need to be enabled for a
>>> given devicetree can be a painful process.  Create a new tool to
>>> find the drivers that may match a devicetree node compatible,
>>> find the kernel config options that enable the driver, and
>>> optionally report whether the kernel config option is enabled.
>>
>> I would find this more useful to output a config fragment with all the
>> options enabled. The hard part there is enabling the options a given
>> option is dependent on which I don't think kbuild takes care of.
>
> Do you mean to generate something like .config? If yes, then IMO it would
> not be a correct configuration file.

No, only a config fragment which is just some subset of config
options. Then you could have a generic defconfig plus the fragment for
a platform to get a working setup.

Rob