linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5728025E.9040902@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2016 09:43:58 +0800
From:	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface

Hi,

On 05/02/2016 07:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:26:32PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> +	gpiod = gpiod_get(dev, "vbus_en", GPIOD_ASIS);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(gpiod))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(gpiod);
> This is clearly an inappropriate name for the signal in generic code,
> it's specific to your use case.

I will change the gpio name to "gpio". Is that okay?

Best regards,
Lu Baolu