[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00243350-1ccc-75e5-8cd8-a58dfe14637f@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:52:08 +0800
From: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs if the mmio
page is exclusive
On 2016/5/3 10:59, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Yongji Xie
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 8:22 PM
>>
>> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap
>> sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio
>> page may be shared with other BARs. This will cause some
>> performance issues when we passthrough a PCI device with
>> this kind of BARs. Guest will be not able to handle the mmio
>> accesses to the BARs which leads to mmio emulations in host.
>>
>> However, not all sub-page BARs will share page with other BARs.
>> We should allow to mmap those sub-page MMIO BARs which we can
>> make sure will not share page with other BARs.
>>
>> This patch adds support for this case. And we also try to use
>> shadow resource to reserve the remaind of the page which hot-add
>> device's BAR might be assigned into.
> 'shadow' usually means you have a corresponding part being
> shadowed, while here looks you mostly want some 'dummy'
> resource for reservation purpose?
Yes., 'dummy' may be better here. And I would also replace
shadow_res/shadow_resources_list with reserved_res/reserved_resources_list.
>> +
>> + if (!(res->start & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Add shadow resource for sub-page bar whose mmio
>> + * page is exclusive in case that hot-add device's
>> + * bar is assigned into the mem hole.
>> + */
>> + shadow_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*shadow_res), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + shadow_res->resource.start = res->end + 1;
>> + shadow_res->resource.end = res->start + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> What about res->start not page aligned so you end up still having
> a portion before res->start not exclusively reserved?
Do you mean add a 'dummy' resource to reserve the portion
before res->start if res->start not page aligned?
But would it happen that there is a mem hole in the portion
before res->start? The resource should have been assigned
into the hole at the beginning.
Thanks,
Yongji
>> + shadow_res->resource.flags = res->flags;
>> + if (request_resource(res->parent,
>> + &shadow_res->resource)) {
>> + kfree(shadow_res);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + shadow_res->index = index;
>> + list_add(&shadow_res->res_next,
>> + &vdev->shadow_resources_list);
>> + return true;
> Thanks
> Kevin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists