[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D15F8425FE@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 06:11:20 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs if the mmio
page is exclusive
> From: Yongji Xie [mailto:xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:52 PM
>
> >> +
> >> + if (!(res->start & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * Add shadow resource for sub-page bar whose mmio
> >> + * page is exclusive in case that hot-add device's
> >> + * bar is assigned into the mem hole.
> >> + */
> >> + shadow_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*shadow_res), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + shadow_res->resource.start = res->end + 1;
> >> + shadow_res->resource.end = res->start + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> > What about res->start not page aligned so you end up still having
> > a portion before res->start not exclusively reserved?
>
> Do you mean add a 'dummy' resource to reserve the portion
> before res->start if res->start not page aligned?
>
> But would it happen that there is a mem hole in the portion
> before res->start? The resource should have been assigned
> into the hole at the beginning.
>
Just a quick thought. Another device might occupy that range
before initializing this device, and then 'another device' is hot
removed later...
Thanks
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists