linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/sysfb_efi: Fix valid BAR address range check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 May 2016 12:23:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/sysfb_efi: Fix valid BAR address range check


* Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, 04 May, at 08:35:24AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
> > > 
> > > We can't just break out when meet start is equal to zero,
> > 
> > Hm, wot?
> 
> The existing code treats address 0x0 as invalid for a PCI BAR range
> start address, but 0x0 is actually possible and legitimate, so we
> shouldn't be breaking out of the loop.

Yeah, so I just don't understand the 'when meet start is equal to zero' part - 
what does it mean?

Thanks,

	Ingo