[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5729418E.90909@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:25:50 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface
Hi,
On 05/03/2016 07:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:43:58AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> On 05/02/2016 07:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:26:32PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> + gpiod = gpiod_get(dev, "vbus_en", GPIOD_ASIS);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gpiod))
>>>> + return PTR_ERR(gpiod);
>>> This is clearly an inappropriate name for the signal in generic code,
>>> it's specific to your use case.
>> I will change the gpio name to "gpio". Is that okay?
> Yes, that looks good (and lines up with DT so hopefully the code can be
> shared).
Fair enough. Thanks.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists