linux-kernel - RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2E89032DDAA8B9408CB92943514A0337D463C24B@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 May 2016 09:48:51 +0000
From:	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree

On May 06, 2016, 01:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c:1964:23: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'ACPI_PTR' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(da7219_acpi_match),
>                        ^
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c:1964:23: error: initializer element is not constant
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c:1964:23: note: (near initialization for
> 'da7219_i2c_driver.driver.acpi_match_table')
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   5181365f5312 ("ASoC: da7219: Add initial ACPI id for device")
> 
> I added this patch for today:

This patch was the 3rd in of a set of 3, and the header you added below was
added as part of the 2nd patch of that set, hence why it is missing here. I
assume the first 2 patches are still being reviewed by Mark.