[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462531320.17131.277.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 13:42:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
ismo.puustinen@...el.com,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] dmaengine: dw: set polarity of handshake
interface
On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 18:54 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 16:48 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > + bool polarity;
> So this variable is not very intuitively named.
There is a help above. This is a property of the Synopsys DesignWare DMA
engine. Anyone familiar with datasheet easily understands this.
>
> You end up setting somepointer->polarity = true; in a later patch.
>
> Since you're respining a V4 I'd suggest a name that describes a little
> bit better than polarity. Setting polarity = true is a little bit
> liked
> being asked "you you like ice-cream or apple pie" and then saying "yes
> please".
It's about handshake interface polarity, so, what about hs_polarity?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists