[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49eg9961hh.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:34:50 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block: add missing group association in bio-cloning functions
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> writes:
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 807d25e..e9b136a 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -622,6 +622,8 @@ struct bio *bio_clone_fast(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio_set *bs)
> }
> }
>
> + bio_clone_blkcg_association(b, bio);
> +
> return b;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_fast);
> @@ -695,6 +697,8 @@ integrity_clone:
> }
> }
>
> + bio_clone_blkcg_association(bio, bio_src);
> +
> return bio;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_bioset);
> @@ -1811,6 +1815,8 @@ struct bio *bio_split(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
>
> bio_advance(bio, split->bi_iter.bi_size);
>
> + bio_clone_blkcg_association(split, bio);
> +
Hi, Paolo,
Did you test this? bio_split calls bio_clone_bioset or bio_clone_fast,
so I'd be surprised if you didn't trigger that newly added warning. :-)
Please remove the bio_split call site.
Cheers,
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists