[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57325656.9020808@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 23:44:54 +0200
From: Paolo <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block: add missing group association in
bio-cloning functions
Il 10/05/2016 23:34, Jeff Moyer ha scritto:
> Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
>> index 807d25e..e9b136a 100644
>> --- a/block/bio.c
>> +++ b/block/bio.c
>> @@ -622,6 +622,8 @@ struct bio *bio_clone_fast(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio_set *bs)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + bio_clone_blkcg_association(b, bio);
>> +
>> return b;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_fast);
>> @@ -695,6 +697,8 @@ integrity_clone:
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + bio_clone_blkcg_association(bio, bio_src);
>> +
>> return bio;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_bioset);
>> @@ -1811,6 +1815,8 @@ struct bio *bio_split(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
>>
>> bio_advance(bio, split->bi_iter.bi_size);
>>
>> + bio_clone_blkcg_association(split, bio);
>> +
>
> Hi, Paolo,
>
> Did you test this? bio_split calls bio_clone_bioset or bio_clone_fast,
> so I'd be surprised if you didn't trigger that newly added warning. :-)
Of course I didn't check the kernel log ...
I hope next version will not introduce more bugs than it will fix.
Thanks,
Paolo
> Please remove the bio_split call site.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists