[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5731CD41.60506@st.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 14:00:01 +0200
From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: Implement .pin_config_dbg_show()
On 05/10/2016 01:50 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:25 PM, <patrice.chotard@...com> wrote:
>
>> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
> Patch applied! Because this gives good debuggability.
>
> But think about refactorings:
>
>> +static bool stm32_pconf_input_get(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank,
>> + unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + clk_enable(bank->clk);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + val = !!(readl_relaxed(bank->base + STM32_GPIO_IDR) & BIT(offset));
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>> + clk_disable(bank->clk);
>> +
>> + return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stm32_pconf_output_get(struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank,
>> + unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + clk_enable(bank->clk);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>> + val = !!(readl_relaxed(bank->base + STM32_GPIO_ODR) & BIT(offset));
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>> + clk_disable(bank->clk);
>> +
>> + return val;
>> +}
Hi Linus
> Don't you think these two look very similar for example.
You 're right, i will rework this in a separate patch
Thanks
Patrice
>
> But that can be fixed later, debuggability is more important.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists