[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eg99yha2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:06:13 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
airlied@...ux.ie, aniel.vetter@...ll.ch, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
alexander.deucher@....com, daniels@...labora.com,
derekf@....samsung.com, varadgautam@...il.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com> writes:
> On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> robert.foss@...labora.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
>>>
>>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
>>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
>>> update pending.
>>>
>>> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
>>>
>>> * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
>>> * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
>>> * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
>>> * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
>>> * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
>>> * commit in that case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
>>
>> This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any
>> other KMS folks to catch anything.
>>
>
> I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch.
> Does anyone have objections to it being merged?
I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists