[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5732182E.6090100@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:19:42 -0400
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
airlied@...ux.ie, aniel.vetter@...ll.ch, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
alexander.deucher@....com, daniels@...labora.com,
derekf@....samsung.com, varadgautam@...il.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending
flip event.
Thanks Eric!
On 2016-05-10 01:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com> writes:
>
>> On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> robert.foss@...labora.com writes:
>>>
>>>> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
>>>>
>>>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
>>>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
>>>> update pending.
>>>>
>>>> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
>>>>
>>>> * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
>>>> * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
>>>> * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
>>>> * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
>>>> * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
>>>> * commit in that case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
>>>
>>> This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any
>>> other KMS folks to catch anything.
>>>
>>
>> I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch.
>> Does anyone have objections to it being merged?
>
> I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists