lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160510192117.GC30712@mwanda>
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 22:21:17 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Simon Kelley <simon@...kelleys.org.uk>
Cc:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] atmel: potential underflow in atmel_set_freq()

Smatch complains that we cap the upper bound of "fwrq->m" but not the
lower bound.  I don't know if it can actually happen but it's simple
enough to check for negatives.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
index 8f8f37f..bf2e9a0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
@@ -2275,7 +2275,7 @@ static int atmel_set_freq(struct net_device *dev,
 		fwrq->m = ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(f);
 	}
 	/* Setting by channel number */
-	if ((fwrq->m > 1000) || (fwrq->e > 0))
+	if (fwrq->m < 0 || fwrq->m > 1000 || fwrq->e > 0)
 		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	else {
 		int channel = fwrq->m;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ