linux-kernel - Fwd: [PATCH v4 02/18] nbd: fix checkpatch trailing space warning.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+aCy1EmRvCFnyOZTZMt6T_+iufksoH_EkPfWjfUY7c3Grr4dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 15:08:11 +0530
From:	Pranay Srivastava <pranjas@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	mpa@...gutronix.de, nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: [PATCH v4 02/18] nbd: fix checkpatch trailing space warning.

Greg,

Resending as I missed the cc list earlier.

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:18:30AM +0300, Pranay Kr. Srivastava wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Pranay Kr. Srivastava <pranjas@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/nbd.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> I'm not the maintainer of these files or driver (which is why I don't

The series contained some checkpatch changes so I had included you as well.

> know why you are sending them to me), but I know I do not accept patches
> without any changelog text at all in them, as that's just lazy.

That should be per patch or can appear in a cover letter for the patches?

Actually I've made more patches in this series after I had sent the
earlier ones,
but the earlier ones are not changed at all. It's only the addition of
newer patches
to the series. So I'm not sure how exactly would you like these to be.

>
> But, the nbd.c maintainer might accept them, you might get lucky!
>

Thanks again for the reply. Just in case I don't get any reply from
the maintainer,
which I've not as of today, do I consider these patches as dump or
should I resend
these to somebody else. I would really appreciate if you can answer that.

I still have one more patch to send over these which is an enhancement
rather than
a fix but I've not yet got any review of the patches.

> good luck,
>
> greg k-h

--
        ---P.K.S

-- 
        ---P.K.S