[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160511172823.GC18829@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:28:23 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/14] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Add documentation for
Tegra210 AGIC
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rob, Mark,
>
> On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> > A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform
> > drivers for all interrupt controllers.
>
> Yes, that is fine with me, but can we decide on whether the platform
> driver should match "tegra210-agic" or the early driver should bail-out
> if clocks/power-domains are present?
>
> I am fine with either, but I think that Rob prefers the tegra210-agic
> compat string and Mark prefers to bail-out of the early driver if
> clocks/power-domains are present.
If anything, I wasn't too keen on bailing out becuase of those
properties, as I mentioned for the case of a root interrupt controller.
I am happy to match the "tegra210-agic" string specifically.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists