[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKmTykoMBw9dCpw0X0ep2qTPSu94-zzUmdrFwUfDeXueqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:28:34 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: linux acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vikas Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@....com>,
Sunil <sunil.vl@....com>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
What is the functional goal/purpose of adding CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE?
If the answer is that it saves code space on an ARM build, how much
space does it save?
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists