[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5733928B.7030909@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:14:03 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES issues
On 05/11/2016 01:04 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:51:03PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> XSAVES is a kernel-mode instruction. It offers a compacted format and
>> memory-write optimization. These patches fix issues in the first
>> implementation.
>
> do you even read my emails?!
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160511041741.GB2180@pd.tnic
>
> That's the third patchset in three days! What's with the spamming?!
Borislav, if you don't want to be cc'd on these patches, then please
speak up. I'm sure Yu-cheng would be happy not to cc you.
But, seriously, he's churning through, responding to feedback and
improving the patches quickly. I only wish most patch authors did this.
And, despite breaking it up into 13 pieces, there is *NOT* a lot of
code here. There's no sane reason to wait a week between iterations.
I encouraged Yu-cheng to keep up with the current pace and not wait a
week between reposts, despite what you requested. Sorry. Just speak up
if you want off the cc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists