linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip: nps: add 64BIT dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5735AED9.2000405@synopsys.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 16:09:21 +0530
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>,
	<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: nps: add 64BIT dependency

On Friday 13 May 2016 03:55 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 13/05/16 10:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Friday 13 May 2016 14:05:41 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> On Friday 13 May 2016 01:54 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> On 12/05/16 22:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>  
>>>>>  config EZNPS_GIC
>>>>>      bool "NPS400 Global Interrupt Manager (GIM)"
>>>>> +    depends on ARC || (COMPILE_TEST && !64BIT)
>>>>>      select IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>>>      help
>>>>>        Support the EZchip NPS400 global interrupt controller
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <narc.zyngier@....com>
>>>>
>>>> As I've already started collecting fixes that are aimed at -rc1 (mostly
>>>> to avoid dependencies), I can queue that as well.
>>>
>>> There is a slight logistics issue here - as agreed the driver will go in 4.7-rc1
>>> via ARC tree. So either I pick the fix for rc1 or you apply it post rc1 - or
>>> towards the end of rc1 ?
>>>
>>
>> I'd say the best option is to have you pick up the fix for the ARC tree,
>> but either way works.
> 
> That'd work for me too (I've acked it anyway). Just let me know what you
> decide to do.

I'd prefer Marc takes it post rc1. The reason being chances of merge conflicts
between ARC and tip trees increase with ARC tree changing drivers/irqchip/*. We've
seen two of those already which Stephen fixed up in linux-next. Although
admittedly the conflicts are trivial and given the location of this diff hunk it
might not happen at all....

-Vineet