linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip: nps: add 64BIT dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1605172138330.3851@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 21:39:58 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
cc:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>,
	linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: nps: add 64BIT dependency

On Fri, 13 May 2016, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2016 03:55 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 13/05/16 10:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Friday 13 May 2016 14:05:41 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >>> On Friday 13 May 2016 01:54 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>>> On 12/05/16 22:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  config EZNPS_GIC
> >>>>>      bool "NPS400 Global Interrupt Manager (GIM)"
> >>>>> +    depends on ARC || (COMPILE_TEST && !64BIT)
> >>>>>      select IRQ_DOMAIN
> >>>>>      help
> >>>>>        Support the EZchip NPS400 global interrupt controller
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <narc.zyngier@....com>
> >>>>
> >>>> As I've already started collecting fixes that are aimed at -rc1 (mostly
> >>>> to avoid dependencies), I can queue that as well.
> >>>
> >>> There is a slight logistics issue here - as agreed the driver will go in 4.7-rc1
> >>> via ARC tree. So either I pick the fix for rc1 or you apply it post rc1 - or
> >>> towards the end of rc1 ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'd say the best option is to have you pick up the fix for the ARC tree,
> >> but either way works.
> > 
> > That'd work for me too (I've acked it anyway). Just let me know what you
> > decide to do.
> 
> I'd prefer Marc takes it post rc1. The reason being chances of merge conflicts
> between ARC and tip trees increase with ARC tree changing drivers/irqchip/*. We've
> seen two of those already which Stephen fixed up in linux-next. Although
> admittedly the conflicts are trivial and given the location of this diff hunk it
> might not happen at all....

If the driver is new and in ARC then the fix should go into ARC and shipped
with the pull request.

Thanks,

	tglx