lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5739ED73.4020009@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 16 May 2016 09:55:31 -0600
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in block/blk-mq.c:1459:27 with
 pata_amd

On 05/13/2016 09:31 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Does the patch below help?
>
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix undefined behaviour in order_to_size()
>
> When this_order variable in blk_mq_init_rq_map() becomes zero
> the code incorrectly decrements the variable and passes the result
> to order_to_size() helper causing undefined behaviour:
>
>   UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in block/blk-mq.c:1459:27
>   shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
>   CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc6-00072-g33656a1 #22
>
> Fix the code by checking this_order variable for not having the zero
> value first.

Thanks Bart, added for 4.7.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ