linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <573AFEB1.1060704@pfupf.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 13:21:21 +0200
From:	Juergen Gross <kernel@...pf.net>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc:	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, Douglas_Warzecha@...l.com,
	pali.rohar@...il.com, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, jeremy@...p.org,
	chrisw@...s-sol.org, akataria@...are.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical
 cpu

On 13/04/16 10:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/04/16 16:17, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
>> be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
>> running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
>> parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
>> decisions.
>>
>> This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
>> pin a (virtual) cpu to a dedicated physical cpu for executing above
>> mentioned functions on that specific cpu. The drivers (dcdbas and i8k)
>> requiring this functionality are modified accordingly.
>>
>> Changes in V5:
>> - patch 3: rename and reshuffle parameters of smp_call_on_cpu() as requested
>>   by Peter Zijlstra
>> - patch 3: test target cpu to be online as requested by Peter Zijlstra
>> - patch 4: less wordy messages as requested by David Vrabel
>>
>> Changes in V4:
>> - move patches 5 and 6 further up in the series
>> - patch 2 (was 5): WARN_ONCE in case platform doesn't support pinning
>>   as requested by Peter Zijlstra
>> - patch 3 (was 2): change return value in case of illegal cpu as
>>   requested by Peter Zijlstra
>> - patch 3 (was 2): make pinning of vcpu an option as suggested by
>>   Peter Zijlstra
>> - patches 5 and 6 (were 3 and 4): add call to get_online_cpus()
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>> - use get_cpu()/put_cpu() as suggested by David Vrabel
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>> - instead of manipulating the allowed set of cpus use cpu specific
>>   workqueue as requested by Peter Zijlstra
>> - add include/linux/hypervisor.h to hide architecture specific stuff
>>   from generic kernel code
>>
>> Juergen Gross (6):
>>   xen: sync xen header
>>   virt, sched: add generic vcpu pinning support
>>   smp: add function to execute a function synchronously on a cpu
>>   xen: add xen_pin_vcpu() to support calling functions on a dedicated
>>     pcpu
>>   dcdbas: make use of smp_call_on_cpu()
>>   hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
>>
>>  MAINTAINERS                       |   1 +
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h |   4 ++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c  |  11 +++++
>>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c          |  40 +++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/firmware/dcdbas.c         |  51 +++++++++----------
>>  drivers/hwmon/dell-smm-hwmon.c    |  35 +++++++------
>>  include/linux/hypervisor.h        |  17 +++++++
>>  include/linux/smp.h               |   3 ++
>>  include/xen/interface/sched.h     | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  kernel/smp.c                      |  51 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  kernel/up.c                       |  18 +++++++
>>  11 files changed, 273 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/hypervisor.h
>>
> 
> So patches 1, 3 and 4 are acked. Any comments regarding patches 2, 5
> and 6?

Patch 6 gained another Ack. What about 2 and 5?


Juergen