[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160517112259.GY3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:22:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zengzhaoxiu@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bp@...e.de, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, andi@...stfloor.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 09/31] bitops: Add x86-specific parity functions
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:22:05PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On May 16, 2016 10:06:08 AM PDT, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >blergh; GCC does indeed make a mess of that. It looks we'll need the
> >cc-output stuff for this in order for GCC to generates sane code for
> >that :/
>
> For what it's worth, I have a patchset for cc out just about ready to post. It is in gcc 6.1.
Nice, looking fwd to play with that. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists