[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1605171153070.2494@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:57:24 +0100 (BST)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] EFI ARM Xen support
On Tue, 17 May 2016, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 17/05/16 11:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 May 2016, Matt Fleming wrote:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> Please pull the following branch which contains support for Xen on ARM
> >> EFI platforms.
> >>
> >> This merge includes a merge of Stefano's xen/linux-next branch to pull
> >> in the prerequisites required for Shannon's commit:
> >>
> >> 11ee5491e5ff ("Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI")
> >>
> >> as it needs both the latest changes in the EFI 'next' branch (now
> >> tip/efi/core) and xen/linux-next.
> >>
> >> I have intentionally not included the individual patches as I would
> >> normally do in a pull request, so that commit history created by my
> >> merging of Stefano's branch is preserved, and so that there's no way
> >> to accidentally apply the patches individually.
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 6c5450ef66816216e574885cf8d3ddb31ef77428:
> >>
> >> efivarfs: Make efivarfs_file_ioctl() static (2016-05-07 07:06:13 +0200)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git efi/arm-xen
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to 11ee5491e5ff519e0d3a7018eb21351cb6955a98:
> >>
> >> Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI (2016-05-14 19:31:01 +0100)
> >
> > Is this arrangement working for everybody, in particular the tip
> > maintainers?
>
> Yes.
I meant the x86 tip maintainers (Thomas, Peter and Ingo).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists