[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gYBKC0GxBpFH-jOca7ide-pGc9R1bfi9PCSZgiB1hSAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 01:23:09 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi, Rafael
>
> Can we queue this up in linux-next?
> ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions can be seen.
> We need more tests around this experimental change from the real users to have the chances to learn the unknown cases.
> If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by reverting [PATCH 4/4].
> So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream.
> Thanks in advance.
There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only
contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next
should only contain material targeted at v4.7.
For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but
I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists